Scott Stanford: Questions about our questions
Longtime local Keith Skytta, who served on this newspaper’s editorial board a few winters back, e-mailed me this week with questions about our Question of the Week.
“After much deep thought on who I would cast my vote for sheriff, (I) bring up the question, ‘how do you know the respondents are registered voters?'” Keith wrote. “Accurate polling of registered voters is one thing but ‘opinion polling’ may cast a shadow over future elections, especially if one party organization decides to play dirty and stuffs the opinion box.”
Keith was referring to this week’s question – If the election for Routt County Sheriff were today, would you vote for Garrett Wiggins or Gary Wall? As of Wednesday night, 375 people had voted online and 59 percent answered “Gary Wall.”
Does this mean Gary Wall is going to be the next sheriff? Don’t use our poll to bet on it.
Keith is right – I have no way of knowing whether the respondents in our poll are registered voters. And he also is right about ballot stuffing – we have seen e-mails from both parties urging their members to vote early, and to vote often, in our Question of the Week when the question deals with party candidates in an election.
Let me reiterate: Our Question of the Week is not a scientific survey. That’s why we include the following note: “This is not a scientific poll. The results reflect only the opinions of those who chose to participate.”
The Question of the Week is aimed primarily at our online users, though readers can call in their answers. Of course, that means that some readers probably vote both ways.
Our program tracks the computer from which we receive votes and blocks the same computer from voting more than once. Of course, the program can’t prevent the same person from voting from multiple computers. Also, tech-savvy participants know how to beat the program and vote multiple times from the same computer.
The bottom line? The Question of the Week is meant to be fun and interactive, but the results cannot be used as evidence of community support for an argument, an issue or a candidate.
In 2004, we did phone surveys of registered voters prior to the election. We worked hard to make sure we got a random but representative sample of the community. Not surprisingly, our survey results were very close to the actual results of the election. I hope we can do some similar polling prior to this election.
In the meantime, we’ll keep asking questions of the week that are similar to what you’ll see on the ballot. Just don’t be surprised when the actual results are different than the online poll results.
– From the Editor appears Thursdays in Steamboat Today. Send questions to Scott Stanford at firstname.lastname@example.org, or call him at 871-4221.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Steamboat and Routt County make the Steamboat Pilot & Today’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
UPDATED: New wildfire pops up west of Steamboat; crews investigate smoke reports south of Stagecoach
Editor’s note: This story was updated at 2 p.m. Saturday to include additional information on smoke reports south of Stagecoach.