Martin L. Lamansky: 2 campaigns, 1 divider
2 campaigns, 1 divider
It is heartbreaking to watch the division growing in Steamboat about the bond election. One of the beauties of our community is people on both sides of the issue care about children, education and our community.
The great thing about the two campaigns is both agree on the need for change. However, there seems to be a lack of understanding regarding the nature of school bonds and where we are in that process.
On Aug. 24, the school board determined the parameters of what would be put on the November ballot by a unanimous vote. The proposed changes to the schools and the total money requested to complete the project are specified in the ballot language, which has been certified by the county clerk and recorder. The measures are no longer open for debate. The bond must be voted on as is.
The board deliberated for more than a year before the final wording of the bond was unanimously authorized Aug. 24. Yet, opponents of the bond are still calling for change, asking for a “reset” and demanding more details. They have also labeled bond supporters as inflexible. Yet, by law, the time to debate the ballot language has passed.
The only thing left to do is vote. This is how the Democratic process works. The people who support the bond understand this. They think the plan before us is a good one, and they have made the choice to support the changes to the schools that have been put forward by the community and school board.
This support doesn’t mean every box has been checked and every detail accounted for; nor should it. There are many design and budget items left to be developed and considered if the bond passes. This is the nature of large-scale capital development projects.
To spend the kind of money needed on detailed planning before the passage of a bond would be impossible for any school district, not to mention fiscally irresponsible. Nobody should expect or claim to have every answer and detail at this time, but that is not a reason to reject the bond.
The people who would like a different plan will still get a chance to work on the development of new buildings and programs if the bond passes. If the bond fails, people will have the chance to have input on finding a solution in the future, and the new plan too will have people who both support and oppose it.
The real question is whether the bond plan solves long-term problems in an affordable way. On Nov. 4, Steamboat will still be the town we all love and hopefully the people will move on and continue to honor their home by the way they live.
Martin L. Lamansky
Director of Teaching and Learning,
Steamboat Springs School District
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Steamboat and Routt County make the Steamboat Pilot & Today’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
Allowed, restricted or prohibited: Steamboat Planning Commission weighs in on rules about short-term rentals
In a four-hour work session Thursday, Steamboat Springs Planning Commission held the first of several discussions focused on where short-term rentals could potentially be restricted and what rules would apply in areas where they are…