John Spezia: Commenting on the ‘Our View’ editorial on annexation
After my presentation last week to the editorial board, along with the developers and the pro annexation group, I was curious to read the Steamboat Pilot & Today’s Our View on the annexation. Below I list the editorial board’s points with my comments following.
- Community plans are not the law, they are just guiding documents — What is the point of developing comprehensive plans if they are not followed?
- West Steamboat Neighborhoods was never intended to be an affordable housing project — The public spent a great deal of time developing the West of Steamboat Springs Area Plan with a major goal of affordable housing.
- This is not the Steamboat 700 project —While smaller it has many of the same flaws.
- A single development will not offset housing needs — If the city had a affordable housing program in place, recommended by the Steamboat Springs Community Area Plan in 1993, we would have many affordable housing developments already.
- West Steamboat Neighborhoods is not a perfect solution — We’re asking for a balanced solution.
- West Steamboat Neighborhoods is a growth strategy to maintain community character — How can we maintain character when we leave out part of the community with affordable housing needs?
- “They are basically shutting the door on growth and it is is ludicrous to think another developer will come … to create valuable housing.”— If the city would bring funds and land to the table like other western Colorado ski towns with successful affordable housing programs, we would create valuable housing — affordable housing not expensive houses.
- Delay only puts us further behind — We have delayed the implementation of a viable affordable housing plan since the 1980 SSCAP affordable housing recommendations because “it would hurt our economy.” That is code for cutting into profits.
- West Steamboat Neighborhoods is revenue neutral — We may pay $12 million if the development falters and $30 million of unfunded roadwork if there are no State grants .
A “no” vote is a vote asking for long-term, sustainable solutions for our community.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.