Yes, I listened to them. The cop said "I got a (muffled) people". Dispatch then relayed to backup he was being attacked by 5 males. Where dispatch got 5 from the muffled utterance and got the word males from people, I have no clue. The reporter had to stretch it a little to report "5" people, is she by any chance a friend of the alleged victim? Also, on the 911 call, it doesn't sound to me like the "victims" were scared to death nor "cowering" on the floor "begging", sounded a little calm and put on to me. Remember the "don't tase me bro"...
dukebets... And lying "victims" shouldn't always get settlements. Attacking other posters for their opinion and or experiences does not make you more credible, it just shows the type of person you actually are. You may continue trying to belittle others if you please but this is my last response to your pompous writings.
Here's an OCPD supporter, I know the drama queen and her capabilities. Too many of OC's upstanding citizens know how to "play the game" to get settlements while walking to the bank singing "another one bites the dust".
I read just fine, thank you. You accused litter of a lack of education because you didn't like his/her spelling or grammar and most likely didn't agree with his/her support of law enforcement. I applaud you for your high level of education and your grammatically correct posts but someone that has to prove superiority over another by attacking their education is living proof that education does not always mean intelligence.
If dukebets is correct, it appears that even the citizens that lack education are smart enough to want law and order and a safe place to live. It also appears that some citizens lacking education are smart enough to NOT abuse drugs and alcohol. I am very glad to see that dukebets was elected to speak for "everyone else" from the "lower end of the county" but why would anyone's "needs" be "a lack of education"?
"He was sentenced to a suspended one-year prison term on the condition he complies with deportation to Mexico and never illegally re-enters the U.S.", and goes on to tell us what happens if he re-enters the country legally. He committed TWO CRIMES, drugs AND being here illegally, WHY would the US allow such an outstanding citizen back in the country legally?
Wedel says"there was every opportunity for the police and police commissioners to admit that if so many people are upset then something must be wrong and let's try to figure out how to fix it". WHY not look at it this way, "if so many people" DO NOT show up because they have no reason to complain, maybe there is nothing wrong so nothing needs fixing. There was definitely more citizens NOT in attendance than those there to complain.
Seems to me if she hadn't ran the cop would not have had any reason to enter her home. The cop was probably wondering WHY was she eluding and running into her home, to get rid of something maybe? After all it was originally just a traffic stop, she turned it into a three ring circus.
This is just another one of those cases where it is easier to pass a rule (law) that affects everyone in order to control a few. Our lawmakers do it all the time.
Rodeman recordings released
Yes, I listened to them. The cop said "I got a (muffled) people". Dispatch then relayed to backup he was being attacked by 5 males. Where dispatch got 5 from the muffled utterance and got the word males from people, I have no clue. The reporter had to stretch it a little to report "5" people, is she by any chance a friend of the alleged victim? Also, on the 911 call, it doesn't sound to me like the "victims" were scared to death nor "cowering" on the floor "begging", sounded a little calm and put on to me. Remember the "don't tase me bro"...
August 3, 2008 at 9:51 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Rodeman recordings released
dukebets... And lying "victims" shouldn't always get settlements. Attacking other posters for their opinion and or experiences does not make you more credible, it just shows the type of person you actually are. You may continue trying to belittle others if you please but this is my last response to your pompous writings.
August 1, 2008 at 9:59 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Rodeman recordings released
Here's an OCPD supporter, I know the drama queen and her capabilities. Too many of OC's upstanding citizens know how to "play the game" to get settlements while walking to the bank singing "another one bites the dust".
August 1, 2008 at 8:42 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Rob Douglas: A not so hot pursuit
I read just fine, thank you. You accused litter of a lack of education because you didn't like his/her spelling or grammar and most likely didn't agree with his/her support of law enforcement. I applaud you for your high level of education and your grammatically correct posts but someone that has to prove superiority over another by attacking their education is living proof that education does not always mean intelligence.
July 31, 2008 at 10:42 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Rob Douglas: A not so hot pursuit
If dukebets is correct, it appears that even the citizens that lack education are smart enough to want law and order and a safe place to live. It also appears that some citizens lacking education are smart enough to NOT abuse drugs and alcohol. I am very glad to see that dukebets was elected to speak for "everyone else" from the "lower end of the county" but why would anyone's "needs" be "a lack of education"?
July 31, 2008 at 9:56 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Three ACET suspects plead guilty
"He was sentenced to a suspended one-year prison term on the condition he complies with deportation to Mexico and never illegally re-enters the U.S.", and goes on to tell us what happens if he re-enters the country legally. He committed TWO CRIMES, drugs AND being here illegally, WHY would the US allow such an outstanding citizen back in the country legally?
July 31, 2008 at 9:38 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Rob Douglas: A not so hot pursuit
Wedel says"there was every opportunity for the police and police commissioners to admit that if so many people are upset then something must be wrong and let's try to figure out how to fix it". WHY not look at it this way, "if so many people" DO NOT show up because they have no reason to complain, maybe there is nothing wrong so nothing needs fixing. There was definitely more citizens NOT in attendance than those there to complain.
July 28, 2008 at 9:55 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Rob Douglas: A not so hot pursuit
Seems to me if she hadn't ran the cop would not have had any reason to enter her home. The cop was probably wondering WHY was she eluding and running into her home, to get rid of something maybe? After all it was originally just a traffic stop, she turned it into a three ring circus.
July 25, 2008 at 2:18 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Brent Boyer: Cleaning up our online comments
This is just another one of those cases where it is easier to pass a rule (law) that affects everyone in order to control a few. Our lawmakers do it all the time.
July 25, 2008 at 11:08 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Fun with tasers
Could be Jazz, but they sure weren't concerned when it came to the sheriff or anyone else that was headed to court.
July 24, 2008 at 12:24 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )