Archive for Sunday, April 27, 2008

Former Granby mayor Ted Wang discusses the Granby Ranch, which at 5,200 acres is the largest piece of property the town has annexed. The land area of Granby has quadrupled in recent years because of annexations, Wang said.

Former Granby mayor Ted Wang discusses the Granby Ranch, which at 5,200 acres is the largest piece of property the town has annexed. The land area of Granby has quadrupled in recent years because of annexations, Wang said.

Towns avoid costly residential development

  • Email
  • Post a comment
  • Print
  • Share

Advertisement

Video

Granby annexation

Former Granby mayor Ted Wang discusses why his town wanted to annex thousands of acres of land.

Former Granby mayor Ted Wang discusses why his town wanted to annex thousands of acres of land.

photo

Special tax districts have been established to fund required infrastructure improvements in Granby developments.

photo

Granby has required real estate transfer assessments in annexation negotiations.

photo

Unlike Granby and Steamboat Springs, the town of Hayden has no desire to annex any more land for residential purposes.

Hayden by the numbers

- Population: 1,634

- Total housing units: 658

- Mean travel time to work: 26.6 min.

- Median household income in 1999: $42,147

- Median value of single-family, owner-occupied homes: $132,100

- Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Granby by the numbers

- Population: 1,525

- Total housing units: 628

- Mean travel time to work: 15.6 min.

- Median household income in 1999: $46,667

- Median value of single-family, owner-occupied homes: $153,200

- Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Size: 700 acres

Buildout: 10 to 25 years

Residential units: 1,827 to 2,243

High-density residential units (condos, townhouses, apartments): 45 percent

Small, single-family lots (under 8,000 square feet) or duplexes: 36 percent

Square footage of commercial/nonresidential uses: 272,000 to 331,000

Affordable housing target: 80 percent to 150 percent AMI (area median income)

Permanently deed-restricted housing provided by developer: 20 percent (367 to 448 units)

Topography: Most slopes 5 percent to 15 percent, some 30 percent or more on bluffs and hillsides

"Village centers:" three to four stories

Open space: 221 acres (32 percent)

Trails: 10+ miles

Infrastructure cost: $103 million

Additional off-site automobile trips a day generated: 14,000

- Source: Steamboat 700 Initial Submittal, November 2007

— Planning Services Manager John Eastman knows officials in other communities might raise an eyebrow when he says Steamboat Springs is "encouraging residential development."

The statement sounds a little crazy because of Colorado's tax structure, which Tim Katers said prevents the state's sales-tax-based municipalities from generating revenue from residential development. Katers is a planning consultant who works for Hayden and other small Colorado communities.

Steamboat officials agree with Katers. A report being prepared for the city's Planning Commission, which is considering urban growth boundary amendments, states that "multiple studies : clearly show that single-family residential development costs the city of Steamboat Springs more to serve than revenues received through sales tax."

"Based on the financing mechanisms that the city has in place, residential has shown to be a money-loser for the city," Eastman said. "If each new resident could at least bring a tourist along, we'd be OK"

Nonetheless, Eastman said the city's great need for affordable housing means it is willing to consider the annexation of Steamboat 700, a 700-acre development that proposes about 2,000 homes on a parcel just west of city limits.

"It was a recognition that if we want to continue to remain a real community, we have to provide at least some opportunity for the people who work here to live here," Eastman said. "We've got a goal of being a real community."

As Steamboat city officials address the challenges and opportunities presented by the potential annexation of Steamboat 700, municipalities across Colorado are tackling very similar issues. Minturn residents will vote May 20 on a proposed, 5,300-acre project on Battle Mountain. And in Durango, a project nearly identical to Steamboat 700 in size and uses is beginning to take shape.

Hayden has drawn the line when it comes to the annexation of anything but commercial and industrial properties, while Granby has staved off collapse and quadrupled its size in less than a decade with the annexation of about 7,000 acres of resort development such as the SolVista Basin ski area.

Grow or die

"We knew that we had to grow or we were going to die, literally," said Ted Wang, former mayor of Granby.

"Our sales tax was completely flat," Wang said. "Inflation alone was eating us alive. We knew we absolutely had to do something to increase our economic engine."

As a result, developments such as Granby Ranch, which includes SolVista Basin, Grand Elk Ranch & Club and Orvis Shorefox, were brought into town limits. Although these projects are geared toward second-home owners, Wang said the town required a strong commercial component be a part of each project. Grand Elk, for example, includes 350,000 square feet for commercial use along with its 730 housing units. In its initial submittal to the city of Steamboat Springs, Steamboat 700 proposes 272,000 to 331,000 square feet of commercial with 1,837 to 2,243 homes.

But Granby didn't stop at requiring commercial space, and Steamboat officials don't intend to, either. The Granby developments established special districts to tax their residents and fund required infrastructure improvements. Additionally, a percentage of the districts' bond proceeds go to the town. At Shorefox, Development Manager Jeff Martin said the development's tax district is approved for $40 million in bonds. If the full amount is issued, the city will see $3.6 million from Shorefox alone. Wang said the town's annual budget is about $4.5 million.

"The only stipulation is that they have to use it downtown, which we think is a good thing," Martin said. "You need a downtown to succeed for your developments to succeed."

"You want the vitality of downtown to grow at the same time these projects grow so it's a cohesive town together," added Steve Bromberg, general manager of the Shorefox and Grand Elk developments. "It's a benefit to the public, but the public is going to include residents of Shorefox."

Tax and mend

Bromberg disagrees with the notion that residential development doesn't pay its own way.

"During the early stages of development, we agree that's costly to the town. But once a project is platted, that's when this thing stabilizes," Bromberg said. "Once a new community is developed, why should that lot owner be treated differently than one that wasn't annexed recently?"

Granby also has required real estate transfer assessments in annexation negotiations. After the initial sale of property in the developments, a small percentage of future sales is given to the town.

Wang said these measures and others have successfully mitigated the costs of growth and that the town's economic needs for annexation have been fulfilled.

"We did a number of things that we felt were more creative," Wang said. "Over the long haul, that's really important, and that's where it's really important to have this vision to look decades out. Over the long-term, it makes a big difference."

Steamboat 700 Project Manager Danny Mulcahy has proposed similar measures. He has proposed a taxing district to pay for ongoing maintenance costs, and he has proposed a real estate transfer assessment to be devoted to affordable housing. Like Bromberg, Mulcahy said there should be a limit to how much the city exacts from the future residents of Steamboat 700. For example, Mulcahy said it wouldn't be fair to charge only his residents for traffic improvements the city will need with or without his development.

"I don't want our residents to be second-class citizens and pay disproportionately," Mulcahy said. "I don't think that they should have an exponentially higher burden than the rest of the community."

In addition to a taxing district and property transfer fees, Eastman said the city is contemplating a number of creative mechanisms, such as on-street parking fees, to at least make Steamboat 700 a revenue-neutral venture.

Thanks, but no thanks

"Residential annexation is something we're not interested at all in right now," Hayden Town Manager Russ Martin said. "We've got so much acreage in town that's already zoned residential."

Hayden approved its most recent annexation earlier this month when it added 16 acres west of town for Precision Excavating. At a Town Board meeting, Trustee Tom Rogalski called the annexation "just the kind of economic development thing we've been looking for."

Hayden approved the 47-acre annexation of the Dry Creek Village residential development in 2005. The deal required the developers to pay a number of fees and share in the cost of realigning Routt County Road 37, among other things. But the town since has lost its taste for expanding its limits for anything but commercial or industrial uses.

"Housing doesn't pay to bring in right now," Trustee Richard "Festus" Hagins said. "Right now, I'd rather see commercial growth."

Hagins said an increase in population - and also demand on town services - is inevitable due to resort activity in Steamboat and oil and gas development to the west. He said the town's strategy is to offset the cost of that growth with revenue from commercial and industrial activity.

"There's days I wish the phone would stop ringing," Martin said. "It's hard to keep concentration on existing services when you're constantly reviewing things. My focus is on making sure existing residents don't pay more."

Reasons for annexing property - and what to annex - vary across Colorado with the needs of the particular municipality and the wishes of developers. Unlike Hayden, Steamboat does not have an abundance of vacant land within city limits that is zoned residential. And unlike Granby, the city is not in a position where it needs to grow or die from an economic standpoint. Steamboat is concerned about the death of its character.

"People love Steamboat because of the working class nature of it," Mulcahy said. "At the end of the day, we have conflicting desires. We want the town to stay the same, but to keep it the same, we have to let it grow. If we want to have any opportunity to keep the same culture and character in the town, we have to keep the opportunities for the same people to live here."

Comments

steamboatsprings ( anonymous ) says...

Be very careful city planning or Danny M. will maneuver you into the position where he pays little for the impact of adding nearly 50% to our city and it is all shouldered by the new residents over the next 30 years. Annexation will add a tremendous amount to his land value and that he won't wait 20, 10, 5 or even a year to realize when he is done. Whatever he may say he is a smooth talker from Vegas that has little attachment to Steamboat and will flip this property before the dust settles on the annexation agreement to a group who cares even less about Steamboat who will bring their lawyers along in tow. Chad Fleisher and Pam V. already have feelers out looking for buyers and Danny's group has put it in front of several private equity groups. Both will happily move on to retire elsewhere along with Danny when the deal is done. This is not something I have heard, it has passed over my desk and I have gotten calls asking for my perspective from others in NYC. Not the sort of people that plan to be here in person nor care what happens in Steamboat since they won't be hanging around town or be a bit worried about the legacy they leave for their children. It is one thing to be creative, these guy are sly and there is a big difference.

I am embarrassed by their act on how much they care. This could be a positive addition to Steamboat and my feeling is that City council is managing it well. Just don't let planning with their single minded focus on affordable housing, for which they have not bothered to study what types we actually need choosing to focus only on on 2 Bedroom condos, sell the farm on other key aspects in return for units they don't yet know know the actual types that are needed.

Council is on the right track to entertain all annexation requests at the same time. I hope that they plan to leave none of them with a corner on supply. Steamboat 700 is not the only option. There are options and combinations of options that will allow us to stage into this more gradually learn as we proceed and not do so much at once that the whole deal is approved before we get some feedback on it's impacts.

Why approve 2000 homes when you can step into this more gradually? 300-500 make more sense and won't really change the rate that the new supply is absorbed by the market. Just the length of time it takes the homes to sell and will give us a chance to do it better for the next 300-500 homes once we have had a chance to learn from the first round.

April 27, 2008 at 10:59 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

steamboatsprings ( anonymous ) says...

Who wants a mega development of vanilla homes like is such a blight all around Denver. Take a drive around 470 next time you are in Denver if you want to see what the west side of Steamboat will look like if we annex all of Steamboat 700 as Danny has so artfully positioned. Remember we do have a choice to start smaller by annexing smaller pieces of two or more different owners so that our community can retain a more unique nature that destined when you annex like Denver suburbs. And it will not change what can be reasonably be absorbed per year in either market rate of affordable units.

Let's school Danny at his own game for the benefit of the rest of us that plan to stay. He will present endless reasons why it won't work and throw a fit more than once. If you want a strategy that is best for Steamboat in it's balance, thoughtfulness and opportunity to refine before the stampede of wild horses is out of the barn and we are trampled it is worth looking hard at this option, finding ways to make it better and building a broader consensus than is possible with an all or nothing approach. Danny and his group are taking risk and that can be worthwhile even laudable in the right hands but there is no obligation for Steamboat to push all of our chips into the center in one hand to allow him to cash in for a short term gain. Why bet it all with so many unknowns? I don't care how smart the group we put together are to negotiate and approve this. There is no way to know what we need 5-10 years from now much less 20 years from now. Do we want entitlements hanging out there that long with the rate that building, green technology and styles evolve? Go to 20 year old parts of Denver if you want to see what that is like and picture 1/3 of our town looking like that all in one place.

BTW The Shorefox development in Grandby that was mentioned above is in default on two or more layers of their development financing. Can you imagine the impact here in the not too unlikely event that that same happens with Steamboat 700. It is very difficult to get or renew financing for large developments right now no matter who you are and the standard development loan lasts for 2 years. I would be scared to have that hanging over my head with the kind of sales prices they will need on their postage stamp lots with houses that are wall to wall with their neighbors. Steamboat 700 is not that great of product so even a minor hiccup or delay could put them into default and that would be saddest of all for Steamboat.

April 27, 2008 at 11:08 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

grannyrett ( anonymous ) says...

steamboatsprings-Words of wisdom.

April 27, 2008 at 11:10 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

steamboatsprings ( anonymous ) says...

Thank you, I hope it adds some value to the discussion. This type of approach seems to have some merit but I am game for the best plan whether someone improves this or comes up with a better way. What is best for Steamboat's future is the most important thing to me. It scares me to bet so much on something that is so hard to quantify or predict how well the direction you take will work. Scarier still when it has a decent chance of going under in current credit markets and becoming an albatross for all of Steamboat.

April 27, 2008 at 11:45 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

HawaiianEye ( anonymous ) says...

Steamboat albatross's.....remember Eagle Ridge? Chaddwick?

April 28, 2008 at 12:23 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

realistic ( anonymous ) says...

It took 6-8 years of the best growth Steamboat ever had to fill silver spur and heritage park. Now we are talking about an area roughly the size of all old town. This is massive, and potentially a huge eyesore.
In the 80s, Willett heights came on line with hundreds of lots. The infrastructure was placed, and the entire area sat vacant for 10-12 years. A great green hill turned into asphalt , dirt piles,and fire hydrants.
Phase, figure out the traffic, create some big green belts, plan! You only have one chance to get this right. do not rush into this project just to wish you would have taken more time to consider all things. This single project will forever alter our town.

April 28, 2008 at 12:38 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

SilverSpoon ( anonymous ) says...

how much does the annexation actually cost?

Each home will have to pay:
sanitary sewer tap fee
water tap fee
And a monthly water bill, with taxes and fees.

The developer has to place services over the whole development.

Is there a need for a new waste water treatment plant or expansion? Do we have sufficient water treatment?

The city is funded by our high sales tax. If it is fiscally responsible, bring on the affordable housing subsidies!

April 28, 2008 at 1:27 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Post a comment (Requires free registration)

Posting comments requires a free account and verification.

Return to top of page